New date set for Borden Holgate chambers application
Wednesday, March 19th, 2008The application by Borden Holgate to lien Kari Klassen’s settlement has been re-scheduled for April 29th at 10:00 a.m.
The application by Borden Holgate to lien Kari Klassen’s settlement has been re-scheduled for April 29th at 10:00 a.m.
The presiding judge was Chief Justice Laing. He initially reserved his decision. After court, it was brought to Kari Klassen’s attention that Chief Justice Laing was the judge who attempted to have Richard Klassen and Angie Geworsky investigated for practicing law without a licence in the Hathway matter and that a complaint was filed to the Canadian Judicial Council. A letter was immediately sent to the Queen’s Bench addressing this issue and by 4:00 a fax was received stating that he had stepped down and the case would be put back on the chambers list to be argued in front of another judge. That date will be set on Monday March 17th, 2008.
The motion has been postponed to March 13, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.
On Thursday February 7th 2008 the New Government of Saskatchewan announced they would pay the plaintiff Kari Klassen a further 18,750.00 which was held in abeyance pending the outcome of appeals in relation to Matthew Miazga. They further announced that they would pay another $18,750.00 to Kari Klassen which was also held in abeyance in relation to Carol Bunko-Ruys. Under the NDP Governement If Carol or Matthew were susessfull in their appeal to the Supreme Court the plaintiffs would lose all money held in abeyance. Robert Borden law office filed a counter appeal on Carol Bunko-Ruys on behalf of Kari Klassen without her knowledge. (more…)
“I look forward to representing myself before the Supreme Court of Canada. Although I would rather have had the whole ordeal over with now, I was never totally satisfied with the Saskatchewan Court of Appeals reasoning for continuing the liable as against Miazga. Justice Baynton’s original judgment read like a book, it gives the reader a complete and precise road map as to how Miazga was malicious, and I fully intend to stick to that judgment at the Supreme Court. Justice Baynton found that any prudent, cautious, right minded person would have known my family and I were innocent and would not have proceeded with charges. The New Government of Saskatchewan will now be on the hook should Miazga maliciously prosecute again. In the meantime, like Dr. Charles Smith, Miazga may himself have many more in his wake considering Justice Bayton ruled he was not prudent, cautious or right minded! In the meantime I am more than confident that I will convince the Supreme Court to see it the right way, once and for all.”
Richard Klassen
injusticebusters.com will remain online indefinitely. At this time, we no longer have the resources to assist others as the majority of this was done at our own expense. Should circumstances change, we would gladly return.
All recent posts as well as Sheila Steele’s years of hard work can be accessed through the search engines at the top of the page.
Richard Klassen and Angie Geworsky.
In 2006 several complaints were launched against Borden Holgate Law Office in relation to their handling of the Klassen/Kvello civil suit and the civil suit of Michell and Kathleen Ross. Once again the Law Society of Saskatchewan has whitewashed their handling of the cases. Big surprise! Evidence of the allegations contained within the complaints is clear and we will get to the bottom of this. iZon Injustice/injusticebusters will expose the truth just as they did in the malicious prosecution of the Klassen and Kvello families. If the truth is on your side, it always comes out in the end.
1991: Saskatchewan hit the world map with its two satanic cult cases; Martensville and the Klassen case. The media were reporting like never before. In one case there were 14 adults and 2 young offenders charged and in the other case there were 9 adults and 1 young offender charged. The public was so confused they couldn’t tell the two cases apart. In the end, all the charges in both cases turned out to be a hoax and the Saskatchewan justice system was red-faced. Eventually it went away…or did it? (more…)

Crown Prosecutor Matthew Miazga
The story that never ends… On December 30th, 2004, Saskatoon crown prosecutor Matthew K. Miazga was found liable for malicious prosecution. (more…)
Miazga’s high court appeal shouldn’t be on public tab
Re: Crown Prosecutor wants top court to hear appeal (SP, Aug. 30). Matt Miazga had a right to appeal but I object to the province paying for it.
September 12, 2007 Star Phoenix article. (click to read)
WOW, how soon we forget! In December of 2004, just before his fate was to be handed down regarding his handling of the Klassen case, Brian Dueck conveniently resigned and walked out of the Chief’s office with pension intact just as Myers did in September of this year. (more…)
Justice Minister Frank Quennell believes that “no prosecution should proceed unless the prosecutor has an honest belief”… he goes on to say “those interested in my actual position in the matter can read the opinion of the Court of Appeal Justice W.J. Vancise in the Miazga v Kvello appeal.”
The Justice Minister forgets to take into account the following:

The Saskatchewan people are now being asked to flip the bill to back a prosecutor who was found guilty of malicious prosecution. They are being asked to do so because our Justice Minister believes in the integrity and honesty of this prosecutor, and further believes that he did nothing wrong when he prosecuted 16 innocent people for crimes this public prosecutor knew they did not commit.
The finding of malicious prosecution against Crown Prosecutor Matthew Miazga was upheld and his appeal dismissed by 2 out of 3 judges at the Saskatchewan Court of appeal on May 30, 2007. The appeal was allowed for child therapist Carol Bunko-Ruys.
Michael Tochor, lawyer for Matthew Miazga, says he is currently reviewing the decision and has not yet decided whether an appeal will be filed to the Supreme Court of Canada on behalf of his client.
Read the judgment (pdf)